Sunday, March 30, 2014

LOOSING OUR FIRST LOVE? ( Rev 2:1-7)

LOOSING OUR FIRST LOVE?
(Lessons from the Church of Ephesus)
                                                  Revelation 2:1-7, 03/30/2014
Do you remember the first time you thought you were properly in love?  Did you think about him/her constantly? Think of how many ways you have invented just to see her or to spend time with her alone? Nothing else really mattered, all you wanted was to be in the embrace of each other right? If you’re married, think about your wedding day. Were you excited, nervous, hopeful, happy, and full of anticipation?
The other day we had our couples date night. I asked a question; how did you both meet? Oh boy you should have been there to listen to the exciting, adventures and romantic stories each couple shared.  For some of us it was love at first sight; well that did not stop them there but carried them all the way to the wedding altar. What is even more interesting that these couples are still in in love with each other, for some after some three or four decades of marriage!  

As a pastor for me it was very satisfying to see how couples here are still committed to each other in spite of ups and downs in their marriage. But sadly, many couples separate just a few years after their heartfelt commitment? I wonder what has happened to them, have they lost their first love they had for each other? One marriage expert says, “No matter how sincere we are, staying in love is a choice! Love can grow and become more precious with each passing day; but for this to happen we must pursue the secret to staying in love.” Is it even possible to lose our first love? What happens in a marriage relationship could also happen in our relationship with God and with one another. In fact the Bible says in the last days due to the increase of wickedness most people’s love will grow cold. (Matt 24:12)

For the past few weeks we have been on an exciting journey of studying the book of Revelation. This book is all about the message of God to the world and His Church in particular about what would happen before the final return of Jesus, prior to establishing His eternally enduring Kingdom. We are exploring the seven letters to the seven Churches and how that message could impact us today. For the next few Sunday’s I would like to go through these seven letters. Today we look at a Church that once was on fire for the Lord yet ended up loosing it’s first love.  Revelation 2:1-7 A bit of background to help us understand Revelation. 

 Revelation is a symbolic book, but that does not mean the symbols do not depict literal events like the great tribulation, the white throne; the final judgment, the battle of Armageddon, the coming of the Antichrist, the thousand year rule of Christ; the rapture and the final destruction of Satan; the coming down of the heavenly city etc. Some of the events mentioned in the book may happen literally, and many will not. So while interpreting the symbols we need to realize we “see things imperfectly as in a poor mirror reflection.” ( I Cor 13:8 NLT). However we are to center on the purpose of the text, the message of the text and its application and leaving what, when and how things will actually happen with God.

It is traditionally believed that the apostle John was the author who wrote it at a time when the church was undergoing persecution and difficulty in the first century AD. It was written to encourage believers to look forward to a better social reality in the midst of oppression, a world where God is supreme.
However the real problem was not persecution but compromise. Too many Christians had gotten “cozy” with a pagan world, and so the book calls them to choose allegiance to Christ or to the emperor. So the real purpose of the book of revelation then and now is to encourage and warn Christians that they must stay strong under persecution and not to compromise with the pagan culture as their only allegiances are to Christ and Christ alone.

A bit of background information about the city of Ephesus. It is one of the four most powerful cities in the Roman Empire. In ancient times it was one of the Seven Wonders of the World. Religiously, Ephesus was best known for its temple to the fertility goddess Artemis (Roman Diana). The church was apparently established by Priscilla and Aquila, who had been left there by Paul in A.D 52 and they were aided by Apollos (Acts 18:18-25). Paul returned and spent two years and three months there (Acts 19), apparently using Ephesus as a center for evangelizing the whole region. Later the church struggled with false teachers (Eph 4:14)

Before we dwell into the letter let me explain a general pattern we find in all these seven letters. It contains a commendation (some words of affirmation and praise), a confrontation (a rebuke), a call to repent and a reward to those who repented or will hold firm until the end. With that in mind let’s look at the first letter to the Church in Ephesus. Like all letters it begins with a command, “To the angel of the Church in Ephesus write.” The word angel must not be confused with angels who are the spirit beings, whereas here it could be translated as messenger, elder, leader, bishop or pastor.

“The One who holds the seven stars in His right hand, the One who walks among the seven golden lampstands says this: John begins each letter by describing one of the aspects of the glorified vision of Jesus in order to show the sovereignty of Christ. Here he refers to Him as the One who holds the seven stars (the leaders, elders of the seven churches) and walks among the seven golden lampstands (seven churches).
That shows that Jesus was in absolute command not only over the seven pastors/leaders of the Churches but the churches themselves why won’t He? After all it is His Church and He is the Chief shepherd over all the under shepherds; I am one of them just like any other pastor, elder or Bishop of any Church or organization. John makes an interesting observation here saying that, “walks among the seven golden lampstands (seven Churches) what does that mean?

Osborn notes, “The imagery of “walking” combines ideas of concern for and authority over the Church. Christ is among his people and is both watching over them and watching them.”[1] Jesus not only walked among the seven Churches in Asia Minor but he also walks among the Churches today. My pastor in India used to say, “Every time we come to worship in the Church; Christ walks among the pews wanting to touch all those whose hearts are open towards Him” Therefore it is so important to attend Church regularly; even more so when you are down, discouraged or struggling with sin and sickness, you never know in which one of the services the Lord might reach out and touch you to heal and make you whole.

Vs 2 “I know your deeds” Let’s look at this for a moment. The words “I know” are mentioned in all seven letters. Ch 2:2, “I know your deeds, 2:9, “I know your tribulation” 2:13, I know where you dwell 2:19, I know your deeds; 3: 1, I Know your deeds; 3:18 I know your deeds; 3:15, “I know your deeds.” What does this tell us? It tells us about one of the natural attributes of God, that is his Omniscience. Our God is All Knowing. He knows exactly who you are, where you live, what you do, what difficulties, challenges and victories you are going through, and whether you are living for him or selfishly living for yourself. In other words he knows everything of you.

This revelation of God knowing everything about us must give us confidence knowing that God knows and understands our situation as well as give us a healthy fear of God. Just to know that God is watching; there’s nothing I can hide from him, he sees what I am doing in secret. We had an interesting discussion on this matter in our Thursday Bible Study. I encourage you to attend the Bible Study group where we study the book of Revelation much more thoroughly.

What did Christ know about the lives of the believers in the Church of Ephesus? That brings us to the Commendation part of the letter. The believers in Ephesus had persevered, tested the spirits (I John 4:1) exposed the false apostles, (2 Cor 11:13), endured for the sake of God’s name, they had not grown weary and hated the deeds of Nicolaitans and they were commended for it.

Who are the Nicolaitans? Nothing is mentioned of them anywhere else in the Bible except in the Book of Revelation. So in order to know who the Nicolaitans, were and what their teachings were like, and why God hated their works we must look at Church History and some extra biblical material. Here is what other theologians say about the Nicolaitans: “Irenaeus says that they owed their origin to Nicolas, who was one of the seven deacons (Acts 6:5). Victorinus of Pettau, the first commentator on Revelation, refers to them as ‘false and troublesome men, who, as ministers under the name of Nicolaus. They had made a heresy, to the effect that what had been offered to idols might be exorcised and eaten, and that whoever should have committed fornication might receive peace on the eighth day.”[2]

Barton, in his commentary notes, “They appear to have taught a loose compromise with the social ethics of that day which included idolatry and immorality. They did not separate from the church but seemed to suggest that Christians could embrace the teachings of Jesus as well as attend functions at the various temples and partake of immoral activity that was perhaps associated with the worship of idols.”[3] What do we call this type of ideology? Syncretism! The Church in Ephesus was commended by Christ for their hatred towards such syncretistic teachings and practices that were rampant at that time. Are we today any different from them? Do we find the teachings of Nicolaitns today in the Church worldwide?

We better believe it! The scriptures warn us in the last days, “many false prophets will arise, and will mislead many.” Those who fall for these false teachings believe that all roads lead to God, so it really doesn’t matter which religion you follow as long as you are sincere about your commitment; you serve people and do good to the environment; fight for social justice; human rights etc. They compromise the Truth, where by denying the sovereignty of Christ and the Orthodoxy of His teachings in order to please man and accommodate their philosophies.

If Jesus were to evaluate our Church what would he commend us for? Would he find us like the believers in Ephesus who had persevered, tested the spirits, exposed the false apostles, endured for the sake of God’s name, had not grown weary and hated the deeds of Nicolaitans? I would hope so. We will close on this positive note today and next time we will study what Jesus was upset about with the Church in Ephesus. For a more detailed study on the Church of Ephesus please check out my sermon blog on our Church website. Invite your friends or family members for a Sunday service as we go through this series on the book of Revelation. Amen



[1] Grant R. Osborne, Revelation,P112
[2] Leon Morris, Revelation,(W.B Eerdmans Publishing Company: G.R. Michigan, 2002), 61.
[3] Douglas B. Barton, “ A Glimpse at the Back of the Book” page 27

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Defining Neighbor: Luke 10:32-37

DEFINING NEIGHBOR !
Luke 10: 30-37
03/23/2014

Just a few years ago, an astonishing thing happened in New York City. A construction worker named Wesley Autrey was standing on a subway platform with his two young daughters waiting on a train. Suddenly another man on the platform, apparently suffering from a seizure, stumbled and fell off the platform down onto the subway tracks. Just at that moment the headlights of a rapidly approaching train appeared in the subway tunnel.

Acting quickly, and with no thought for himself, Wesley Autrey jumped down onto the tracks to rescue the stricken man by dragging him out of the way of the train. But he immediately realized that the train was coming too fast and there wasn’t time to pull the man off the tracks. So Wesley pressed the man into the hollowed-out space between the rails and spread his own body over him to protect him as the train passed over the two of them. The train cleared Wesley by mere inches, coming close enough to leave grease marks on his knit cap. When the train came to a halt, Wesley called up to the frightened onlookers on the platform. "There are two little girls up there. Let them know their Daddy is OK."

What Wesley had done was a remarkable deed of concern for another person. He had no obvious reason to help this stranger. He didn’t know the man. He had his young daughters to think about. What he did was at severe risk to his own life. But a human being was in desperate need, and Wesley saw it and, moved with compassion, did what he could to save him. "The Subway Superman"--that’s what the press called him, the "Harlem Hero." But the headline in one newspaper described Wesley Autrey in biblical terms. It read, "Good Samaritan Saves Man on Subway Tracks.

Whenever there is someone who acts selflessly and courageously and rescues someone who is in danger we call them “a Good Samaritan” The media applauds them and they become instant celebrities. But people like Wesley Autrey remain humble and say that, “they just did the right thing.” There are even “Good Samaritan Laws” to give legal protection to people who give reasonable assistance to those who are injured, ill, or in danger. Where did we get this Good Samaritan concept? Let’s look at where this story is found in the Bible. Luke 10:30-37
Background: During a debriefing time with his seventy disciples who had returned from an exciting ministry of signs and wonders a certain lawyer in the crowed wanted to test Jesus and probably show off his knowledge of the Law so he asked, “Teacher what shall I do to inherit eternal life? This was a good question. Jesus answered him with a question; what is written in the law and how do you read it? Just like any ardent student of the law he answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind, and you your neighbor as yourself.”

Jesus complemented him for his knowledge and said, “you have answered correctly do this and you will live.” That is to emphasize the fact that merely the knowledge of the law does not save anyone but believing it and even more so obeying it can save people. The theme of loving God’s people runs deep in the pages of the Bible. One of the ways we can express our love for God is by loving our neighbors. Isn’t that what the essence of the Gospel all about? Our entire Christian faith hinges on only two pillars and they are loving God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength and loving our neighbor as ourselves. In other words we put ourselves in the shoes of those who are in need and try to identify with their suffering and doing any and everything possible to help alleviate their pain and discomfort.

The lawyer thought he could outsmart Jesus so he asked, who is my neighbor? He secretly may have hoped that Jesus would show one of his kind as his neighbor. For the Jews loving their neighbors could only go as far as their own nation and religion. They never considered Gentiles as their neighbors. If they saw a gentile in danger of death, they thought themselves under no obligation to help to save his life. Jesus wanted to correct this wrong notion so he told a parable.

A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho. The road from Jerusalem to Jericho has changed little since the first century. Accessible by foot or horseback, it is approximately eighteen to twenty miles distance. It is a rocky and rugged route and one can expect to make about three miles an hour. The decent is very rapid, nearly four thousand feet from the Mount of Olives to the Jordan valley below. There are many ascents as well along the way increasing the sharpness of the slope and additional hazards to the journey down the mountain.

About halfway there is a huge boulder affording a very convenient place for robbers to lie in wait. There are also many other places to hide along this lonely road earning its reputation as the "Way of Blood." Jesus knew this and somewhere on this narrow trail we are given the setting for the story of the Good Samaritan.
The scripture tell us “A certain Man” we do not know his ethnicity, and family background. All we know is that he was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho. He must have been a Jewish man. Somewhere along the path, thieves waited in hiding. He had little to offer for all they took was his clothing. Two religious people a Priest and a Levite happened to pass by them. Extending no compassion toward the agony and the destitute condition of their fellowman, each crossed to the other side and continued on their way.

Why did the Priest and the Levite not stop to help the man? We could list several reasons why, Martin Luther King in one of his speeches gives a more plausible explanation in regards to why they did not stop to help the poor wounded man. “It’s possible that the priest and the Levite looked over that man on the ground and wondered if the robbers were still around. Or it’s possible that they felt that the man on the ground was merely faking, and he was acting like he had been robbed and hurt in order to seize them over there, lure them there for quick and easy seizure.
And so the first question that the Priest and the Levite asked was, ‘If I stop to help this man, what will happen to me?’ “But then the Good Samaritan came by, and he reversed the question: ‘If I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?”[1]

We all can be guilty of asking the first question out of fear for our own lives when it comes to helping someone in danger. I am for one missed a few such opportunities, thinking that I was married and have three children and what would happen to me and to them if I would stop to help someone who was in danger?
In our story the Samaritan seemed to have none of those concerns or fears. All he saw was a near to death Jewish man, and moved with compassion did what the Priest and the Levite had failed to do. For the lack of a better word he gave “First Aid” He bandaged the wounds with his own linen. He poured on oil and wine; wine to wash the wound and oil to sooth it and close it up. He put the man on his own donkey and brought him to the inn. He put his personal business away for a while and took care of that man that night as if he was one of his very own.

The next day he left some money with the landlord and undertook to repay what was spent beyond those two silver coins which shows that he was genuinely concerned over his full recovery and total well being. All this kindness and generosity one could have expected from a friend or a brother; and yet here it is done by a total stranger, that too a Samaritan. After listening to this story the so called expert in the law had nothing else to say or ask Jesus. So Jesus asked him this time another question, “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers? The expert replied; “the one who had mercy on him.”  Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.” Interestingly Jesus emphasized “doing” two times to show where God lies his emphasis more. The Priest, and the Levite seemed to have religious appearance and have known the law in and out but whereas the Samaritan man put into action whatever little he has known which is to help those who are in need

What is the practical application of this story? Let’s consider we that we all in our un-regenerated life were like the man who fell in the hands of the robbers. Our sin infested lifestyle has robbed us of our joy, relationships, health, and our very life itself. We were struck by the devil and left half dead. But thankfully on that road walked Jesus the Good Samaritan; He saw our pitiful condition, came near to us; picked us up, washed our wounds, and healed our sin and left us in the care of the steward (the Holy Spirit) so that we will be fully healed and recovered.

Jesus is asking us today since you have received mercy now do likewise and give mercy to the undeserving. How do we do it? By reaching out in practical ways to our neighbors; (anyone who is in need of help), by being there for people when they need us. By being tender to those who are hurting. By being patient with those who are struggling. I pray that God will give us grace so that we will exemplify the attitude of the Good Samaritan toward those in need without respect for gender, race, ethnicity, wealth or standing in the community. Amen




[1] http://www.biblegateway.com/blog/2012/04/why-didnt-they-stop-martin-luther-king-jr-on-the-parable-of-the-good-samaritan/

Thursday, February 27, 2014

MESSAGE TO CHURCH IN EPHESUS REV 2:1-4

MESSAGE TO CHURCH IN EPHESUS Rev 2:1-4
02/27/2014
 Vs 1-7: Letter to the Church in Ephesus


1“To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lamp stands. 2 I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false. 3 You have persevered and have endured hardships for my name, and have not grown weary. 4 Yet I hold this against you: You have forsaken the love you had at first. 5 Consider how far you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first. If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lamp stand from its place. 6 But you have this in your favor: You hate the practices of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. 7 Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who is victorious, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.

  A special note on how do we connect these ancient seven Churches to the Church in modern times.  These were seven local churches in Asia Minor, but they were each representative of a particular age in church history.  Therefore in a marvelous way, the Lord takes churches currently existing at that time and compares their behavior and their circumstances with certain epochs which were yet to appear in church history. Throughout the book of Revelation the Lord wants to make one thing clear that he is writing the history of the future.
What phases in church history do these seven churches represent? The church of Ephesus corresponds to the Apostolic Church. The church in Smyrna represents the age of the Ceasar and the emperor worship. The church in Pergamum represents the state church, beginning with Constantine and continuing to the end. The church in Thyatira represents church and state combined. The church in Sardis pictures the Reformation church, beginning the sixteenth century. The church in Philadelphia represents the missionary church, beginning with the rise of modern missions under William Carey (1761-1834). The church in Laodicea portrays the apostate church of the last days. I’ve heard some theologians say that these seven churches can also represent seven different life stages in the journey of a Christian believer.
John begins to write down the revelation he has seen and received to the seven churches in the province of Asia. These letters are addressed to the seven angels of the churches. The word Angel is mentioned 185 times in the N.T out of which 76 times in the book of Revelation alone (The Englishman’s Greek Concordance NT). In Greek it has a range of meanings: such as messenger, envoy, and angel. The following are a few of its usage:
I.                   (avgge,louj) Angel is used for men who were the religious messengers.
Lk 7:24: After John’s messengers left.
Mk 1:2 “Behold I send my messenger before” (Mt 11:10, Lk 9:52; Lk 7:27; 9:52)
Jas 2:25: She gave lodging to the spies and sent them off
II.                Angel is used for a bishop or a particular elder of a presiding church:
Rev 1:20 “the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lamp stands are the seven churches.”
Rev 2:1 “To the angel of the church in Ephesus write”
Galatians 4:14 “but you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus Himself.”
III.             Angel is used for created spiritual angel either good or evil:
Matthew 24:36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.”(Mk13: 32)
Matthew 25:41 “Then He will also say to those on His left, 'Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels;”

Munger notes four functions of the “angel” in the seven letters: 1) To establish a corporate identity between the church and the angel. 2) To establish the unique distinction of each church.3) To emphasize the fact that each church is a spiritual entity. 4) To serving churches by carrying out God’s orders to them.”[1] avgge,lwoj is used more number of times referring to created supernatural celestial beings than the human messengers. Morris notes various opinions of the usage of avgge,lwoj in his commentary:
“The word angel can be used as human messengers, some suggest that it means something like “guardian angels of the churches. Swete suggests, “The angel of a Church may be simply an expression of its prevailing spirit.” Others prefer to think of some earthly representative of the churches. Some others think that the angels or the bishops or pastors, overseer, elder or leader.[2]
In Rev 2:1 avgge,lwoj in my opinion refers to a messenger or an elder rather than an supernatural being. The reason being, the revelation was sent to John by an angel (heavenly being) and when he is sending the message to seven churches in Asia writing to another (heavenly being) angel doesn’t make sense, hence it could be translated as messenger, elder, leader, or pastor.
Background of the city of Ephesus:
It is one of the four most power cities in the Roman Empire. In ancient times it was one of the Seven Wonders of the World. Religiously, Ephesus was best known for its temple to the fertility goddess Artemis (Roman Diana). It was the home of many sacred temples including some to the emperors (Augustus himself commissioned one to Julius Caesar in 29 B.C). The imperial cult thrived there. Indeed, under Domitian (81-96) Ephesus was named “warden” or guardian of the imperial cult (called a “temple keeper), and a temple to Domitian was built. Acts 19:19-20 tells us, there was great interest in magic and sorcery in Ephesus.

The church was apparently established by Priscilla and Aquila, who had been left there by Paul in A.D 52 and they were aided by Apollos  ( Acts 18:18-25). Paul returned and spent two years and three months there (Acts 19), apparently using Ephesus as a center for evangelizing the whole region. Later the church struggled with false teachers (Eph 4:14) [3]

Vs 1: “The one who holds the seven stars in his right hand, the one who walks among the seven golden lamp stands, says this” indicates the fact that the message is directly coming from God. Osborne notes “Ta,de le,gei( this is what…says) is a prophetic formula built on OT patterns. As BAGD 553 points out, this formula was used by Persian kings as well as OT prophets in authoritative decrees, meaning this is what…says.” Muse (1986:147-61) believes this formula shows that the seven letters are primarily prophetic in nature. Beale (1999:229) points out that the formula of Ywaheh occurs 21 times in the Minor Prophets (12 in Zechariah) and thus means Christ is assuming the role of Yahweh in addressing the churches.”[4]
John begins each letter by describing one of the aspects of the glorified vision of Jesus (Rev 1:13-17) in order to show the sovereignty of Christ. John’s letters, to the churches except to Laodecia follows a similar pattern. The letter typically begins with a commendation, a confrontation, a warning to change and finally it ends with an announcement of reward.
I. Commendation: God knows the deeds or works of the Ephesian Church. In the NT often (the works) denotes what a man is and how he acts.(Key Word Study Bible). Rom 2:6 “He will judge every one according to what they have done.”(NLT) II Cor 11:15 “In the end they will get the punishment for their wicked deeds deserve.”(II Tim 4:14; III John 10; Rev 2:2, 5, 6, 22, 23).
When God says to the church in Ephesus that He knows their deeds could it be that he is saying that he has knowledge of their actions. Osborn confirms this notion “the e;rga are more than just ‘good deeds’ but refer to the whole spiritual walk of the believer, as defined by the contents of the “deeds” in the letters.”[5] The believers in Ephesus had persevered, tested the spirits (I John 4:1) exposed the false apostles, (2 Cor 11:13), endured for the sake of God’s name, and hated the deeds of Nicolaitans.
Nothing much is mentioned about Nicolaitans in the Bible other than what is written in Revelation. Irenaeus says that they owed their origin to Nicolas, who was one of the seven deacons (Acts 6:5). Victorinus of Pettau, the first commentator on Revelation, refers to them as ‘false and troublesome men, who, as ministers under the name of Nicolaus. They had made a heresy, to the effect that what had been offered to idols might be exorcised and eaten, and that whoever should have committed fornication might receive peace on the eighth day.[6]

Confrontation: After acknowledging the good qualities in the church of Ephesus, God confronts them saying “But I have something against you that you have left your first Love.” The word avlla. “But” introduces the change in the tone of God, he was not pleased with some of the actions of the Ephesians; in this case they left their first Love. The text doesn’t really give us a clue on what it meant by leaving their first love. Is it their first love for God or their love for the fellow men or could it be both? How have they left their first love?
Osborne explains “In referring to avga,phn many scholars assume that it is horizontal or brotherly love. For instance, Beasley-Murray (1974a: 75) says it “was primarily love for fellow men,” and Ladd says “Due to their struggle with false teachers and their hatred of heretical teachings, the Ephesian believers have left their love they used to have for their fellow men. Others view that it is primarily as love for God. However a growing number e.g Mounce, Johnson, Krodel, Thomas, Giesen) recognize the difficulty of separating love for humans from Love for God and Christ.”[7]

After reading various commentaries I conclude that the Ephesian believers have left their first love for people which once was the result of their love for God. Jesus taught his disciples that they were to Love God first. Matt 22:37-39 “You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind….You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Jesus also predicted that in the end time many people’s love would grow cold. Matt 24:12 “And because lawlessness is increased, most people's love will grow cold.”
Osborn notes, “Throughout the NT love for God/Christ is emphasized (Rom 8:28; I Cor 2:9) as is love for our fellow believers (John 13:34; 15:12; I Thess.4: 9; I Pet 1:22). Indeed one cannot exist without the other.”[8] According to I John 4:20 “Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen.” God equates our lack of love for people to the lack of love towards Himself.
After carefully studying the context, it seems to me that the Ephesian believers in their enthusiasm for the truth, have grown cold in their love towards fellowmen. Outwardly they were zealous for God but in the end God holds this against them. If we say love God then we do not have an option but to love his people regardless of their sexual orientation, ethnic, cultural, religious and gender differences because God loves all people.




[1] Grant R. Osborne, Revelation Exegetical commentary on NT, (Baker Academic: G.R. Michigan, 2002), 111.
[2] Leon Morris, Revelation, NT Commentaries,(W.B. Eerdmans Publishing: G.R. Michigan, 1969), 56-57.
[3] Grant R. Osborne, Revelation commentary on NT, (Baker Academic: G.R. Michigan, 2002),108-109,
[4] Ibid., 111.
[5] Grant R. Osborne, Revelation, commentary on NT, (Baker Academic: G.R. Michigan, 2002), 112.
[6] Leon Morris, Revelation,(W.B Eerdmans Publishing Company: G.R. Michigan, 2002), 61.
[7] Grant R. Osborne, Revelation, commentary on NT, (Baker Academic: G.R. Michigan, 2002), 116.
[8] Ibid., 116.